I admit it may be too early too tell, but assuming Ian Sac's account of his side of the story holds up that he was in fact the victim of an assault (there are always two sides to a story but it usually boils down to witnesses and credibility of the parties), do you think Ian Sacs should personally sue Hoboken 411 for a blatant attempt at libel (i.e. publishing things that are knowingly false or with malicious intent trying to destroy ones personal reputation with completely unfounded or made up information)? Or perhaps another politician who put out a defamatory press release today? Share your opinion in the poll below:
◦