Wednesday, June 1, 2011

Hoboken Municipal Election Winners and Losers Part 1

Here is my take on Hoboken's 2011 Municipal Election winners and losers in two parts. Here is part one for now and I conclude with part 2 later in the week:

Loser: Scott Delea 5th Ward

Mirror mirror on the wall,
who lost another election once and for all,
at least Scott bested Belfiore and made up ground,
but he didn't quite make it to the second round.

He as a politician was vaccous and non-committal,
and the truth in his flyers he did distort,
but put up a detailed policy question for submittal ,
and only a stuttering non-answer was his retort.

Another lost election for Scotty in the month of May,
Surely not enough "old guard" support to win the day,
But Party with a Purpose will keep him from going astray,
here is another word that rhymes, can you say toupee?

Anybody But Cunningham "Das Killer Klown Klaussen" would rage,
but can you take him seriously with alleged multiple roommates at his age?,
Cunningham won outright and predicted it like a sage,
and now with Scott Delea its time to turn the page.

Loser X2: Perry Belfiore 5th Ward

He got crushed. He came in third place. He had a few poorly printed comical fliers full of lies and distortions. He without a doubt had the best hair but he got beat by Dave Roberts light in Scott Delea for second place. All the big words and mea culpas couldn't buy Bellfiore "Old Guard" support.  Boys and girls: can you say political dinosaur? Perry, how about a slush puppy? My treat!



Loser: Michael Russo

Predictably he won his re-election bid by about a two to one margin. So why do I have Mike Russo in the loser column? Simple: he lost his political narrative and the City Council Majority. If you remember on the FBI tapes he was bragging how he was going to have control over the City Council when Beth Mason's slate came to power in May of 2009. Mason came in 3rd place in that election.

He then thought he had redemption when his puppet friend Tim Occhipiniti won by buying at least 400 votes in November of 2010. Mike Russo's belly fat exposed in jubilation at the announcement of Tim winning back then will forever be etched in the annals of Hoboken politics. Longer shirts next time Mike!

This election has him back in office without the finance chair and a majority. Leaving future FBI activity out of the picture Mike Russo remains as a Hoboken relic, "The Clown Prince of Corruption".

Advice to the New Majority: give this politrickin' gum flapper his 5 minutes and move along. Nothing of substance other than subsistence and subsidy.

.........

All three of these winning candidates got out their vote and none of them resorted to vote buying but rather good old fashioned pound the pavement campaigning.

Winner: Theresa Castellano 1st Ward

Theresa exceeded what many thought her maximum base of 600 by 70 votes. Almost half of her votes came from Marine View Towers. Old ladies in walkers, whole families, and all sorts sprung from their apartments and showed up for her on election day in those two buildings.

Winner: Jen Giattino 6th Ward

Jen Giattino supposedly hit every street address in her ward 10 times. Now that is pounding the pavement. The result speaks for itself for Jen as a politician. Nino, never really stood a chance. Some call her Dawn 2.0 for her grassroots appeal. She may turn out to be even more formidable than Dawn as a Politician. Time will tell as she migrates away from her "green period".

Winner:  Peter Cunningham 5th Ward

Peter Cunningham said to me on election day that he was taking this in the first round. He gave me a breakdown that was largely correct but he was actually under by 100 votes due to the low overall turnout. He still avoided the runoff anyway. I always thought he could win but in a runoff. Peter knows his ward well and it showed on election day. He even carried Fox Hills Senior building. Amazing!

Cannon Fodder Award goes to:  Greg Lincoln

Greg Lincoln ran for City Council realizing he was a long shot to win at best. What he did the most for the Dawn Zimmer slate was occupy Michael "Mea Culpa" Russo's ground troops on election day. While they were busy breaking all kinds of minor ELEC rules on election day his hooligans could have been better deployed elsewhere in the City where things were up for grabs. Once place might have been Nino Giacchi's campaign. Just goes to show that things are not as always as unified as they always may appear in the land of the "Old Guard". Like the takers that they are (when you are subsidized you are a taker) egos and self-interests get in the way for the old guard. Greg was in it to win it but his efforts distracted Russo enough to hog his campaign resources when he really didn't need to in hindsight.

Push: Timmy

Puppets don't win, only their handlers. Push goes to Tim Occhipinti. More vote buying, more arrogance, more stilted speech, more BS, no leadership, and more anti-Zimmer sniping. Nothing more to see here: move along. Oh wait, there is still an investigation from the AG. I guess we will have to wait.

Oh, Mike Novak's new plan being pimped by BOE vote buyer Carmelo Garcia for knocking down the housing projects in 4-4 and upzoning indicates the razing of Mama Johnson field that Hoboken just spent money on to evaluate. Will Timmy the "independent " stand up to that by golly or simply roll over for his political bosses?

Push: Beth Mason 2nd Ward and Perpetual Mayoral Candidate

Sure she won re-election but missed the possibility of a run-off by only 10 votes. With all that money? With a challenger who wouldn't mix it up with her because as a person he is really that nice? Some victory. Push.

Winner: Beth Mason's 2013 Mayoral Race (Existentially)

The day she won re-election as 2nd Ward Councilwoman is the day she kicked-off her 2013 Hoboken Mayoral Campaign. The only way she doesn't run is she gets offered a bigger position. Who is going to do that for a woman who needed full on Ramos and Russo support in Applied just to squeak by? Don't hold your breath.

To be continued: More later in the week. There will be some people on part 2 that may surprise you....... ◦
Share/Bookmark

Comments (21)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
good write up RG. No mention of lenny luizzi? : )

I was impressed by castellano as well, as much as I hate to admit it. She got the win.

Indeed Cunningham did very well, no runoff was impressive. The fact that all wards were contested, and the old guard was forced to compete hard in every race, certainly should be congratulated.

Most importantly, SD wears a rug?? The FBI should get to the bottom of that
1 reply · active less than 1 minute ago
'do tell ! I don't want to split hairs about iambic pentameter, so hats off to our poet laureate R-G, but I don't think it's a rug, I think that's a cover story, even though I think I've heard some others suggest Mr DeLea's a bald faced liar about the budget; after all he said some hair-raising things! Moreover, I think his is wigging out over how he's got a few new gray hairs after everyone brushed him off in part because they saw through his thin hair-brained scheme of bearding Mr Cunningham in his den. This little shaver will have to comb over his address book to find someone new to back his greasy kid stuff. In terms of his future electability potential, net value for his shave and a haircut, two bits.
Help hoboken's avatar

Help hoboken · 722 weeks ago

I can't be convinced that Castellano got the win. Yes, she was forced to do some old time campaigning because she had a very credible, honest opponent that she rightly was concerned could pull off a big win. If that was all it was then hats off to the old girl. But she campaigned using the tried and true Russo scare tactics. Spreading untruths, scaring marine view residents and others receiving preferential treatment that their days were numbered if Eric Kurta won election. Painting Kurta as un-American. Why I even heard she called him ---RESPONSIBLE. The nerve
10 replies · active 722 weeks ago
Castellano has done this so many times now she knows exactly how many votes she will get, and never felt threatened by Eric. Eric never did enough to peel off votes from that base, or to engage those that do not live in subsidized housing. Castellano's base will always be a one issue constituency that can be easily scared into voting to maintain the status quo. For a first ward candidate to win they need to get higher turnout from the other side. This is done day by day and voter by vote, and is not something that will happen through signs and mailers.. Jen Giattano had the right formula for how to win which any future 1st ward candidates should take note of.
I for one thought Mr Kurta fought pretty hard and pretty smart, but I don't pretend to have all the answers or that much insight. So I might understand where you are coming from, please expound on your percieved differences between the Kurta and Giattino campaigns. Honest question.
Jen was out there every day for months engaging her constituents and winning them over one at a time. No slight against Eric, but he is just not that type of politician. Eric has as good a grasp of the issues as anyone in Hoboken, but when it comes to getting votes it takes old fashioned pressing of the flesh, and that was not really Eric's strong suit.
OLDNEWCOMER2's avatar

OLDNEWCOMER2 · 722 weeks ago

One other thing I'd add about Kurta, who I don't know personally, is that an issue he's been closely associated with on blogs (as 'himself', or as 'estevens' back in the day on 411) is kicking high income people out of buildings like MV. Again I can't repeat enough (Kurt's post length limits won't let me!) how I agree with this *in theory*. But as a practical political issue, it mightily pisses off a tangible constituency, but doesn't really do anything tangible for any other consituency. Putting 'more deserving' subsidized people into MV wouldn't lower taxes. Fairness for its own sake is nice, but not a strong political motivator, thinking of the critical gap in reform's support at the polls from people who pay taxes directly or indirectly (as market renters) but don't show up to vote.

Hoboken will never be fixed without pissing people off, but do it in a way which rewards somebody else, *tangibly*, consistent with your principals. IOW maybe a previously loud advocate for against high income MV freeloaders, but who has no specific new proposal to lower taxes for 1st Ward taxpayers, is not the best guy to run against Castellano.
That is a pretty fair and accurate take on those candidates.

Sent from my iPhone
Eric Kurta's avatar

Eric Kurta · 722 weeks ago

The "right formula", eh? Pressing the flesh, voter by voter? I had the same quaint notion when I began campaigning in February. The First Ward is young and transient. Many voters that had voted just two years ago have since moved out of town. There are relatively few families, and parents are your most engaged voters. Most buildings have intercoms or doormen. There is little face-to-face interaction, except for those building you can get access to, and even then few voters are pleased to have someone knocking at their door. Voters that are likely to vote for me work long hours, go out to dinner after work, go to the gym straight from work, etc. They are generally not home until 7:30pm and don't want to be bothered after 8pm. On weekends they are gone as soon as the first nice day arrives. Got suggestions? The next First Ward candidate really needs to hear them.
InfotainMe's avatar

InfotainMe · 722 weeks ago

Eric, I would take it a step further. Reform is 2 years away from oblivion. It has taken the message it wants to from it's 4-2 defeat in May. Setting aside the issue of corruption in elections - if humanly possible....

-Harsh defeat in November 4th ward race
-Crushing blow in school board election
-Swamped in May council races, not even managing runoffs in 4 defeats and getting blown out of the 2 wards with the highest vote counts.

And pretending to have the world by the short-and-curlies. This is a time to think about what went wrong and strategize, not gloat.
OLDNEWCOMER2's avatar

OLDNEWCOMER2 · 722 weeks ago

I might not call the common attitude gloating, but there does seem to be a sense that Reform has arrived at a focused and coherent set of issues that's a big winner with the *voting* public, when recent election results don't seem to show that.

Maybe the FBI will deliver another deux ex machina (without the previous one we'd still be under Mayor Cammarano). Otherwise things are not going in an encouraging direction, I agree.

Just speaking for myself, it's hard to get really excited about Zimmer/reform when they seem so lukewarm and unspecific on serious tax cutting, and seriously upending the system to allow that, whatever it takes, not just making excuses why it's 'impossible'. Maybe with a council majority they will. I will always vote and will certainly never vote for Russo/Mason. But maybe there are a sizeable number of people sort of like me who don't bother to vote because the achievements of Zimmer are somewhat abstract, to them, compared to the concrete reality of crushing property taxes. Or maybe there aren't a lot of sucg people, but in any case it seems anti-reform now has more enthusiasm.
I couldn't agree more, Info. This past set of Board of Ed and then Council Ward races, or should I say by and large drubbings, should be a major wake up call that the current Reform strategy is ineffective. Notice I didn't say wrong. Ms Giattino and Mr Cunningham worked long and hard, and I heartily thank them, they performed extremely difficult tasks, but as I have suggested before, Mr Giacchi didn't really mobilize and it cost him. Mr Cunningham broke his butt and did a great GOTV to avoid a run-off, a most commendable job, but let's acknowledge the opposition in that ward was splintered, distasteful and disorganized. I won't bother to trot out my favorite W Churchill quote again but, let me suffice to say that by and large Reform was "out-maneuvered and out-mobilized" doesn't begin to cover it. That's why we need the FBI here: because under the current dynamics, in many areas the nice guys playing by the rules don't have an even chance. The fact that they are playing by the legal rules means they are beat before they get out of bed in the morning. I'm sorry to say this, but Reform needs a more cohesive, unified brain and direct, bare knuckles approach to problem solving or it will not gather steam, it will rather become more and more of an "also ran" footnote. And I'll admit to being part of the problem.

And on another note, all that having been said, IMO the main reason Mr Kurta lost is he wasn't on a level playing field. However, I salute him for a great effort. Too many people that were automatically going to vote with the Machine, whose votes were simply harvested by hook or by crook, no matter who was in his box on the organizational chart. Plain and simple, the deck was stacked against him the minute he decided to play by the legal rules and take the high road. But on top of that, as mentioned earlier, it is a valid point, the sad fact is the history of taking on the abuses of the Old Guard for years didn't help where people who actually vote came into play. Isn't that a shame for democracy?
Yes! Infotainme and p1ywood are 100% correct! The problem with most Hoboken voters is they will not begin to pay attention unless things are really going badly. Ironically Mayor Zimmer's steady and competent management of the city may be the death knell of reform as competent government causes its citizens to be complacent and apathetic. Our only hope is the FBI investigation getting people to pay attention. But we have already seen that a city councilman can agree to accept bribes on tape and still win in a landslide. You want to save reform from oblivion you need to start the work now.

Go door to door now to get all of those apathetic renters to register and request vote by male ballots.

Move all of our elections to one day per year so that people don't get warn out.

Implement laws that will prevent buying of votes, or put pressure on our state government to prosecute.

Reform has made progress in Hoboken before and apathy has one out. Read this article from nearly 25 years ago and see if any of this sounds familiar. It is sad that after all this time we are still fighting the same battles.
http://www.nytimes.com/1988/03/07/nyregion/a-drea...
OLDNEWCOMER2's avatar

OLDNEWCOMER2 · 722 weeks ago

I agree with Arthur. It shouldn't be taken as a personal attack on either Kurta or Greaney. I didn't step up and run for CC against people as bad for Hoboken as Castellano and Mason, and the candidates who did deserve credit for trying. But...reform needs to do much better on mobilizing votes one by one, face to face, or word of mouth among people who know one another. Reform and/or Greany also has to be tagged as loser in 2nd Ward IMO. 1st Ward was very difficult, but reform/Zimmer should be tougher on themselves about allowing Mason to avoid a runoff, IMO.
Unfortunately 333 River sat this out. Beth and Terry lied to Applied that Eric and Tom would kick out low income tenants. Beth lied about the budget surplus. It still appears that in Hoboken lying and sleazy attacks work. Not to mention agreeing to accept a bribe.
my bulldog just took a dump in front of masons place, i forgot to pick it up
2 replies · active 722 weeks ago
Grafix Avenger's avatar

Grafix Avenger · 722 weeks ago

Sal, I'd like to make your dog GA's 'Dog Hero of the Week'. If you send me his pic, and a few lines describing the incident, I would love to pay homage to your pooch. Not that GA endorses leaving not cleaning one's dog-crap, but... you forgot to, right? I'm sure it slipped your mind.

grafixavenger666@gmail.com
Grafix Avenger's avatar

Grafix Avenger · 722 weeks ago

MSV wishes to up the reward. We'll feature Fido as dog of the month.
Also, we'll feature him in our new subscriber email.
1 reply · active 722 weeks ago
Grafix Avenger's avatar

Grafix Avenger · 722 weeks ago

Now, now... don't poach my Doggy- hero! Alright... I'll make him Dog-of-the-Decade... or the Century!

Top that, Horsey-pants!
Not to screw the pooch on the comedy being unleashed, but it gives me 'pause' how this thread is really going to the dogs. Maybe I'm barking up the wrong tree, so I won't hound you, but I believe the political wags want it back.

Post a new comment

Comments by