Lane Bajardi and wife Kim Cardinal launch $2 million defamation lawsuit against GA, MSV and over 10 other anonymous local bloggers
Complaint states that it is the Bajardi’s intention to subpoena over a dozen screen names to be added as named defendants in the civil suit, mostly from the AOL Hoboken Patch.
![]() |
Lane Bajardi at Hoboken City Council Meeting |
![]() |
Lane Bajardi texting at Hoboken City Council Meeting |
The complaint does not state why identifying the plaintiffs as the authors of the posts made by prosbus and curious gal is defamatory or what damages they have actually suffered as a result of any material that appears on MSV or GA or on Hoboken Patch. The majority of the allegations of defamation contained in the complaint are against Grafix Avenger but MSV and other anonymous screen names are referred to throughout the complaint.
Both Bajardi and Cardinal state they are not being paid by Councilwoman Beth Mason or her 501(c)(3) Mason Civic League. The complaint also contains allegations that the Bajardis do no associate with corrupt individuals. No mention is made of Beth Mason's numerous campaigns and campaign committees underwritten by her husband, Ricky Mason of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Krantz.
Bajardi also states throughout the complaint that he is "not a person of interest to the FBI and is not involved in criminal activity." In other parts of the complaint Bajardi states he has not been held in the custody of the FBI.
The allegations and claims in the complaint are stated in the present tense, such as "Bajardi does not post anonymously on Hoboken Patch.", leaving unclear where or not the Bajardis historically posted anonymously on Patch in the past.
In a statement emailed to the Hoboken Journal, Roman Brice wrote:
"We would be interested to find out who's financing this SLAPP (Strategic Litigations Against Public Participation) suit as we don't believe Mr. Bajardi is footing the bills for this lawsuit after having been unemployed for 2 years prior to his recent employment with CBS. We believe that this is part of a conspiracy participated in by not just Mr. Bajardi but other political operatives."
From the "Letter to the FBI" series which has appeared on the Grafix Avenger site, the complaint claims that the satirical material wherein GA refers to her joining the FBI and assisting in arresting people associated with corruption is a threat of violence to the Bajardi family, as there is a reference to an address on “Park Avenue.” However, no street number is contained in the satirical post.
One of several allegations in the complaint against MSV notes that the MSV Premium Content contained an assertion that Bajardi and Cardinal moved to Edgewater, NJ. (The Hoboken Journal subscribes to the MSV Premium Content and notes that the only names mentioned as part of a "Mason minion family" reportedly moving to Edgewater were the screen names "prosbus, curious gal, et. al"; the names of the plaintiffs Bajardi and Cardinal do not appear anywhere.)
Left without any explanation is why a statement that the Bajardis have moved to Edgewater is defamatory, even if it is not accurate and that throughout the complaint both Bajardi and Cardinal claim they are not prosbus and curious gal. Nor is any explanation given why stating an Edgewater abode has caused any damages to the plaintiffs.
The subject of compensation between Bajardi and Mason has been broached publicly in May 2011 at a City Council meeting. Bajardi, replying to earlier questions surrounding his communications with Mason and the unauthorized release on Hoboken411 of a HPD discrimination lawsuit stated, "Councilwoman Mason, at any time have you ever paid me one penny for my friendship?"
Mason's quietly replies "no" leaving unanswered whether or not there has been any payment for services rendered by Mr. Bajardi.
The complaint also threatens to issue subpoenas against a number of recognizable posters (anonymous defendants) on local Hoboken websites as follows:
This Means War, Napoleon Complex, khoboken, Hoboken1653, HobokenLeaks, Redrider765, JAM, and JackStop.
Additional screen names are also identified, some of which are common knowledge due to their public use over many years, with no citation whatsoever:
Bludiamonds, Klaussenfluffer, Bet Mazin, InfotainMe, plywood, Hobbs, Bob R, davidd, ss1959, "among others."
According to the complaint, Lane Bajardi and Kim Cardinal "had an excellent reputation in Hudson County" - "until the action of the defendants." Plaintiffs claim they are also acting against "the threats to their child."
The complaint states its intention to subpoena all the listed names, plus unknown and unlisted "others" from Hoboken Patch, Grafix Avenger, Google, MSV, NJ.com, and GallowayPatch.com followed with a "second wave" to corresponding Internet Service Providers (ISPs).
The California based First Amendment organization Electronic Frontier Foundation is aware of the case and asked any people posting under the anonymous names to contact their legal intake manager Mark Jaycox. The EFF is interested in assisting as it considers the freedom to post anonymously a cornerstone right in United States history.
Mark Jaycox can be contacted at (415) 436-9333 extension 128. The EFF website is at url: https://www.eff.org
![]() |
Lane Bajardi hugging it out with Michele Russo as Matt Calicchio (r) stands nearby at a Hoboken restaurant last year. |
![]() |
Lane Bajardi and Michele Russo at a Hoboken City Council meeting. |
Editor’s Note: The strategy of the Plaintiffs seems to be to require the defendants, both named and unnamed, to spend a lot of money and intimidate the defendants from covering local politics with their websites and posting comments that are contrary to the political views of the Bajardis. For those who have followed Hoboken politics closely, this is what Beth Mason does. She throws money at situations and there is a healthy suspicion that she is behind this lawsuit. Beth Mason at the last City Council meeting publicly and blatantly stated to Roman Brice that he was facing the imminent filing of a lawsuit against him.
There was one item in the complaint that really struck me as odd. One of the defendants asserted: "your child might be better off raised by wolves." I just can't believe that is actually in the complaint. Some might consider that impolite but how is hell is that defamation?
Confession: I have often thought what it might be like to be raised as a feral child. The freedom, the outdoors, never having to hear the parents worrying about the mortgage or a SLAPP lawsuit.
A comment such as that might be considered by some as over the top but if everyone got sued for making a remark like that one I don't think people would ever talk to each other.
The Jersey Journal also has a story of the lawsuit filed by the litigious Bajardi's and somehow they left out the screen names in the lawsuit that also targets over 10 anonymous bloggers. I wonder if that has anything to do with the pro-machine editorial slant of Auggie Torres? Their slant on the story I will leave to the judgement of the readers of this website.
I will not comment further as this is pending litigation and it affects two of my friends in Hoboken plus possibly others from a lengthy list of John Does.
Read here and feel free to comment:
http://www.nj.com/hobokennow/index.ssf/2012/08/hoboken_activist_files_defamat.html ◦

davidd · 660 weeks ago
So is a full copy of this thing floating around somewhere?
khoboken · 660 weeks ago
This Means War
khoboken
Hoboken Leaks
Jack Stop
Napoleon Complex
Hoboken1653
cont.
khoboken · 660 weeks ago
Bet Mazin
KlaussenFluffer
InfotainMe
SmartyJones
Buludiamonds
Jam
Redrider765
plywood
davidd
ss1959
Hobbs
Bob R
"and others"
Yes, SLAPP me silly, I am one of the "Damned", along with "Others". I am sure that the complaint will be made available for all to see in due time. Trust me, it makes for some very funny reading. But it is not a funny situation. Common decency prevents me from saying what I really think about all of the participants who have aided the plaintiffs in this silly little game that they are playing. Legal counsel prevents me from commenting about the merits, or lack thereof, of the lawsuit. But if I were allowed to comment, there would be an awful lot to say about the lack of merit of the lawsuit.
TommKat · 660 weeks ago
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 660 weeks ago
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 660 weeks ago
The organization has shown possible interest in representing the anonymous bloggers so I suggest you contact them if you have any concern over this lawsuit should you feel there is the possibility it could pertain to you.
Bill · 660 weeks ago
Jared L. · 660 weeks ago
You do defame them, calling them operatives, talk about stuffing twinkles in their mouths, calling them fat amongst other names, creating pictures on GA of an obese woman and referring to her as Kim. Posting links to their homes. You're all grown adults and you act like toddlers, disgruntled minions of Dawn. You have no boundaries and at the end of the day Curious and Prosbus are in fact neither Lane or Kim.
You are all to blame and if a judge takes the case, you will lose, no question about it. It is beyond grotesque what you people do on patch, hijack and take it over and make it your own Dawn Zimmer playground. You've ruined it for everyone else, no one comments but you because you have to condemn anyone that posts their. Claire has tightened her ship, most of you are now banned for life, you'll realize that when you try to log in this week.
And your ongoing hysterics is crippling Dawn Zimmer. While many of you haven't met her or claimed to not know her, to the 50,145 people here that don't comment like you do, they see your comments and automatically think bad of her.
Whether Beth is involved or not is irrelevant. What is reality is how are the john does and others going to pay to fight this? When Dawn loses, you're all going to be blamed and when your identities come out for the public, thats a whole another spectrum. You all got set up, you fell for it, they roped you in and they have you all dead to rights. You lose, they won.
Exjasperation · 660 weeks ago
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 660 weeks ago
I am not listed in anyway in the defamation lawsuit but thanks for the information on my colleagues over at MSV and GA. This so called assertion that they were set up should be very helpful in proving that this is a SLAPP lawsuit which I believe it is rather than a defamation case should it turns out to be true.
jim doe · 660 weeks ago
thats defamation.
know why jim boys always late? [edited out as personal attack]
davidd · 660 weeks ago
davidd · 660 weeks ago
Also you seem positively gleeful, makes me wonder if your posts would have had anything that Mr Bajardi or Beth Mason would object to. That also may explain why you aren't on the list.
Perry Gutenmorgen · 660 weeks ago
[youtube tK9WClVNAQU&feature=related http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tK9WClVNAQU&feature=related youtube]
notatwinkieeater · 660 weeks ago
deleted9879414 85p · 660 weeks ago
Jared L. · 660 weeks ago
Jared L. · 660 weeks ago
Lisa22 · 660 weeks ago
Redrider765 · 660 weeks ago
deleted9879414 85p · 660 weeks ago
Nice try.
Redrider765 · 660 weeks ago
LightCoffee · 660 weeks ago
AlmostDefamous · 660 weeks ago
"Cautionary tale to everyone - Roman runs a hate blog site that does nothing more then smear innocent people. He is paid by Stan Grossbard - Zimmer's husband to spew his hatred and lies."
http://hoboken.patch.com/articles/governor-says-h...
"A defamation suit could wipe you out. I hear one such suit is already heading "hot head's" way. A law firm has been retained to view the material on both of your sites. Of course I don't know what your liquid net worth is but if you are - as suspected - taking payments from Stan Grossbard then you can't be worth all that much."
1) States that Stan Grosbard pays Horse & GA. Defamatory to Stan Grosbard.
2) Defamatory to Horse and GA for claiming that their thoughts are not their own but compensated political activities.
Ok, now let's pretend we don't know who HobokenQuestioner is.
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 660 weeks ago
AlmostDefamous · 660 weeks ago
ZimmersBroomStick · 660 weeks ago
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 660 weeks ago
Have a nice day!
puzzledone · 660 weeks ago
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 660 weeks ago
jim doe · 660 weeks ago
jim doe · 660 weeks ago
ZimmersBroomStick · 660 weeks ago
Jimmy Twelve Names · 660 weeks ago
Bill · 660 weeks ago
after his fat ass ate up all the caramel corn and peanuts.
jim doe · 660 weeks ago
Rory Luvs Franz · 660 weeks ago
puzzledone · 660 weeks ago
That nagging question about how you, CG, prosbus, and Beth Zimmer all knew this lawsuit from the unaffiliated Bajardi clan was coming still bothers me. Same as the question of if they were in communication with Lane and Kim, why didn't those folks just ask the poster to stop, that would have stopped any problems for their ongoing reputation immediately. Certainly they had some responsibility to mitigate this before they were damaged to the tune of 7 figures, a defendant is required to do what they can to mitigate damages, you know.
NotMasonMinion · 660 weeks ago
In other words her motto to her minions is "Fly, fly!"
tess · 660 weeks ago
guest · 660 weeks ago
freedom to speak your mind anonymously is fine, calling a user name who is not the person you think it is by first and last name and alluding that the person is an FBI informant amongst other insults is a crime and will/can be made in to a civil matter.
Not a dumb guest · 660 weeks ago
puzzledone · 660 weeks ago
If you were in this position, wouldn't you try to stop the people who were impersonating you on the web, causing this whole issue? After all, Prosbus and CuriousGal are still posting away, which has the potential of further damage to the Plaintiffs.
Bri777 · 660 weeks ago
Bri777 · 660 weeks ago
Bri777 · 660 weeks ago
LamesEasel · 660 weeks ago
guest · 660 weeks ago
Prince of Hudson St · 660 weeks ago
Get a good lawyer, I recommend this local firm.
http://www.bielanlaw.com/
Guestuvius · 660 weeks ago
deleted9879414 85p · 660 weeks ago
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 660 weeks ago
Barney McFeely · 660 weeks ago
Bwaaaaa · 660 weeks ago
Roman really now? Klaussen is using Beth Mason's credit cards? Sorry there Roman but you
need help, get some.
ss1959 · 660 weeks ago
LarryC · 660 weeks ago
And in general the long list of screen names and especially ambiguous reference to 'others' certainly makes this look more like a speech suppression exercise than a bona fide defamation lawsuit.
That said a small number of the most aggressive posters have thrown a lot of personal 'real life' accusations against the plaintiffs. If it's all satire and not totally real, why not just leave real names and allegations of real life legal, career, weight, etc. problems out of it? But I've no idea if it's defmation, legally.
Separately, the plaintiffs say they 'aren't' prosbus/cg, but if totally unrelated to the statements made by those screen names why not point that out to Patch or in posts under their own names, and second it's ambiguous who a screen name 'is' if the person typing isn't acting wholly independently.
puzzledone · 659 weeks ago
Cindy · 621 weeks ago
Cindy www.gofastek.com
Lee Shin · 615 weeks ago
Lee Shin www.trendone.net
riveraaissa 31p · 591 weeks ago
aissa www.joeydavila.net
write my papers · 528 weeks ago
@cutiejoy22 · 523 weeks ago
nice · 449 weeks ago
nice · 449 weeks ago
nice · 449 weeks ago
freedom apk no root · 428 weeks ago
wave launcher · 427 weeks ago
Game killer apk · 420 weeks ago
life insurance · 313 weeks ago
life insurance · 313 weeks ago
Clash royal · 312 weeks ago
INSTAGRAM 96.0 · 305 weeks ago
clash of · 300 weeks ago