Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Update: Beth Mason flier on the "Budget Surplus"

Update 9/1/2010: This flier was seen throughout the second ward over the last few days. Beth Mason is determined to get her message out. I wonder when we will see this on her ELEC reports for the campaign that never stopped?

This flier from Beth Mason has been in mailboxes in the Second Ward recently
Actually, the plan is to give some of the surplus back. That would be a tax cut of 5%. I would love to see Beth Mason recommend more cuts if she feels that strongly. After all as Richard Turner once said to Beth Mason two years ago at the DCA budget hearing in 2008: "Where is your plan?". Beth did not have any.

Update 8/16/2010: This post has been bumped up to to strong comment volume. I do recommend that when debating the issues that you stick to proper argumentation and refrain from insulting other's intelligence. I do like to allow a wide berth in the comments and generally refrain from moderation so I just make this as general suggestion on this thread. One thing I want to be clear on is that I don't think this faux populism argument coming from Beth Mason and the axis of Hoboken 411 is going to help her politically that much at least to those who follow events closely. What the reserve should be for a city of our size should be the main point of the debate.

Original Post 8/13/2010:
Beth Mason and Hoboken 411 in synch on the "Budget Surplus"

Here is the latest communication from 2nd Ward Councilwoman Beth Mason. The first sentence is predictably a link to the latest factually incorrect article published on Hoboken 411 about the budget surplus.


Dear Friend,


Recently the City of Hoboken filed its year-end financial statement with the Department of Local Government Services, which revealed a budget surplus of almost $20 million.  This surplus belongs to you, the taxpayers. I am calling on Mayor Zimmer to return this money to you immediately in property tax relief.

The surplus was created as a result of the crushing 47% tax increase. This increase resulted in you overpaying thousands of dollars in property taxes. Your money should be returned immediately.

Please stand with me in my call to return this money to the people of Hoboken and help provide much-needed property tax relief.

Together we can make Hoboken a better and more affordable place to live and raise a family. As always if you are in need of assistance or have any concerns please do not hesitate to contact me at (201)-916-8244 or Beth@MasonCityCouncil.org.

Thank you for your time.

Beth Mason
2nd Ward Councilwoman
 
My comment: The portion of the budget surplus that is not marked for anything is $12 million dollars. This has been confirmed by several sources as well as Mike Lenz's comments at the last City Council meeting. Ideally according to Mike Lenz, who is chair of the budget committee, a city of the size of Hoboken should have a budget surplus of about $10 million. In the past, the City of Hoboken had to do temporary financial instruments that cost the City over $800,000 in one year because they did not have a surplus. Remember that under the Roberts Administration that the City Workers almost lost Health coverage because the city wasn't paying their bills on time. Is Beth Mason saying the City should not have any surplus? Is Beth Mason saying the City should give back all the $20 million to the taxpayers? Some of the money is set aside to give the police and fire raises when negotiations or arbitration is completed. Does she want to rob from the cops and firemen their retroactive raises to give back to the taxpayer? The amateur hour of fiscal finance continues with Perry Klassuen, Lane Bajardi, and now Beth Mason displaying they are not even fit to read a basic balance sheet or understand how good government really works.
 
If the Zimmer Administration continues to make the incremental cuts necessary with appropriate reductions in the fire department where if/warranted, as well as other areas of City Hall that could use streamlining, some tax relief will come next year. Perhaps $2 million could come off the surplus and give some tax relief now, but not $20 million. I would rather see that go to paying off the principal of some of our bonds (the ones with higher interest) to put the city in even better shape going forward.
 
Here is an analogous example to explain my position further: I am the Condo Association President of my building and we have 9 units. Every year I don't have the Condo Association balance at zero dollars at the end of year. I always try to keep some carry over between $10-$12K dollars. Why? Because I never know what could come up like a major roof repair. If I started at zero every year I would be hitting the association with one time gimmicks like a special assessment or could run into trouble paying routine bills like insurance or water due to cash flow issues. Duh! You need to have some money in the bank at all times to have smooth operations whether it is a small condo association like mine or a city like Hoboken. ◦
Share/Bookmark

Comments (49)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I have to question if Beth Mason really understands what she is saying regarding the city budget after this press release or just signed her name to yet another Lane Bajardi/Perry Klaussen smear campaign ?
Either Beth is knowingly lying about the surplus or she is ignorant of our City's finances. Either way she's proven herself unfit for the responsibilities of a council person.

Over 8 million of that money is locked in by the state to pay for Roberts' past deficit. Additionally there are tax appeals that have to be paid and other anticipated costs that without the surplus would cause tax shocks. My personal ball parking puts the unpledged discretionary surplus at around 5 million dollars. 5 million in surplus is reasonable, and may be a bit on the low side, for a city the size of Hoboken.
tax payer's avatar

tax payer · 764 weeks ago

I don't want the GOVERNMENT holding more of my money than necessary!!!!!! And, please give us a little more credit than trying to give me back my money in an election year. This will only infuriate me more and make me vote against those that think I am that stupid. The city already has a "rainy day" set aside of $8,000,000.00 because of Judy Tripodi, the prior State and fiscal monitor. Why do you need an additional $12,000,000.00 ??? Hoboken is an affluent town with plenty of bonding power, and does not need such large reserves. They raised taxes by 47% in one year and had almost a 100% collection rate, probably the best in the State, if not the Country.

If you ever leave extra money laying around a POLITICIAN, IT WILL BE SPENT. Why make it an acceptable standard to overcharge the taxpayer. Did you forget that we put 2 out of the 4 last mayors in jail for corruption. With a track record like that, why would anyone be crazy enough to leave money not earmarked for anything laying around. Don't we ever learn!!!

I am disappointed about learning about this surplus through the blogs. I believe this current Administration to be clean, but someone amongst them is giving them really bad advice. I expect more. They are better than that!!

We are the TAXPAYERS, and are the very reason that every job in City Hall exists. Please don't undermine us! Make cuts because they are necessary, not because they sound popular. I have chosen to live in an affluent town with excellent services, with TAXES to match. If I wanted to live in a dump, I have plenty of options.

Ps. Bring back the Garbage Can Crew. If anything, expand that division. I DO NOT WANT TO LIVE IN A FILTHY TOWN! Multi Million dollar Brownstones with Garbage all over the street. This is unacceptable!

As much as it hurts to say, Beth Mason is right on this issue. She is getting back on the right track. It's time for the other eight to get in line, or step aside. Remember who you are working for. You took an oath to do so.
14 replies · active 763 weeks ago
No one is advocating being taxed more than is necessary. That's one of the reasons government staffing is being downsized right now, so taxes are more in line with the services we need.

Having a surplus is what responsible cities do. This avoids having tax shocks when unexpected things happen. It's the same as a building owner putting money into a surplus account because he knows sooner or later something, like the boiler or roof, will need work and he can't raise rents on a dime.
Please, stop with the nonsense. If you are not capable of understanding how finances work, then you deserve a 47% tax increase every year. I will not have it and anyone with a modest size brain underatnds just how awful the City's finances have been for the past decade. I am still stunned, however, that Bet Mazin would buy into this crap.
Tax payer - I'm confused by your post. You say you moved to an affluent town with excellent services and taxes to match, and you want to expand services. Does this mean you think out taxes are not too high and needn't be brought down? Also Mason says this surplus, if it exists should be returned to taxpayers, which if the surplus were actually available and this were done would be a one shot election year gimmick resulting in far higher taxes the next year. You say doing that would infuriate you even more. In the same paragraph you both support and oppose tax cuts. Which is it. If you put your thoughts forward in a more understandable way I'm sure others on here would be happy to discuss them.
I am confused too. What town does this person live in? There are no excellent services in Hoboken. The garbage can brigade spends more time loafing by Dunkin Donuts, talking on cell phones and slowly ambling down the street than doing any real work.

Also confusing is the author's comment on if the city has a surplus, it will absolutely spend it. If we were going to spend it, would we be laying people off? Would we be fighting with the unions over their contract? Would we be exploring shared services to lower costs? Would the mayor and directory salaries have been cut?

Clearly this person either doesn't live in Hoboken or has no clue what is going on at all.
tax payer's avatar

tax payer · 763 weeks ago

"Redrider" what is this this "we" that you refer to. Are you a part of the current Administration or are just incapable of looking at things objectively. The sad part here is that I stumbled at this site thinking that I can make posts amongst a group of people who were non-biased. I now feel that I am amongst a group of campaign contributors at times.

Lets try something different. Lets start our posts by disclosing if we have donated any $$ to the current Council or administration. Lets use "$" for every 500 one has donated, including family and or spouse. So if one household has donated $2,500. you would put "$$$$$" at the beginning of your posts. Why not if we have nothing to hide.

Now back to your venomous "no clue" labeling. If you have learned anything on your short time on this planet, you know that Governments big and small have a history of squandering money that is laying around, or why else would you HAVE A BUDGET! Why not just collect $200 Million a year, "JUST IN CASE NYC invades us" A budget is a tool that is suppose to guide a City through it's annual expenses. It is NOT A SLUSH ACCOUNT. Sadly, many Municipalities use it as an expense report to let us know the damage after the fact, Hoboken is NO stranger to this with regards to past Administrations.

What is so hard about giving us a budget and following it, not making up the rules as you go along. If the budget was negative $10 Million, would you just call it a deficit and leave it in???

As a TAXPAYER I expect a balanced budget from any City Council and Mayor, which may include a small PREDETERMINED RESERVE. I don't want to hear any gimmick as to why the City should keep any additional surplus. If you want a bigger reserve, than have the courage to raise taxes and put it in your budget. Lets see how well that works in the voting booth....

Amazing how any time a budget is underfunded it is up to the taxpayers to come up with the money. Than a soon as the shoe is on the other foot and they stumble upon an extra pile of cash, it becomes "their surplus", not the taxpayers!!!! If this is not a fraud, than I am not sure what is. Feels like one giant Ponzi scheme, in fact it is. They hold our money, and don't even give it back when they have to.

Ps. In the interest of disclosure, my total campaign contribution in the City of Hoboken equals 0.000 Now lets put down our pom poms and have an intelligent discussion!
Anyone buy that taxpayer "just stumbled at this site" ? ;)
Katie_Scarlett's avatar

Katie_Scarlett · 763 weeks ago

Taxpayer - no $ here. Bottom line, the city needs to have 5-10% of its budget on hand in reserves. Otherwise any time an expense comes up we have to bond for the money - and Hoboken has no credit rating, making the cost of borrowing very very high.

If you don't get that concept, that's fine, but please stop with beating a dead horse on this. You're wrong.
And let us not forget you just need to have cash on hand at all times to pay bills. We pay bills on a daily basis but the cash we receive from the state, from taxes & other sources is rather lumpy. That reserve probably fluctuates by several million dollars from month to month just because of how lumpy cash flows are. That is why a snapshot of the cash balance at one moment in time is useless. But not like Perry ever let rationality get in the way of one of his dumb ghost written rants.
The "we" I am referring to is people who live in Hoboken. Those people are called residents. We also vote here, shop here, spend our downtime here and it is the money we pay to the city of Hoboken that pays for everything the city does. I am highly skeptical you happen to be one of those people.

As for the rest of your rant, clearly you have no idea wtf is going. You are taking accounting lessons from people who couldn't balance their checkbooks if they tried. There is no $20mm surplus. Nobody but that venomous shrew Mason and the people she has on retainer (who I must say are some of the dumbest and most obvious people in town) says there is a large surplus. And you still haven't even addressed the fact that the city is actively going out of its way to cut spending which completely undercuts your assertion that the city would necessarily spend any such excess surplus that might exist. If the city starts wasting money, I'll complain then. But right now it seems like what they are going out of their way to do is cut wasteful spending.

Do us a favor. Please stop toeing the Mason party line. She is an idiot.
tax payer's avatar

tax payer · 763 weeks ago

"Redrider" For one, try starting a day in your life without the arrogance. You make assumptions about people that you know nothing about, including where they live. Maybe this is the real reason of your short comings in life. It seems that you only know what others tell you, and need foul language to help your argument along.. I have no horse in this race, and would be ok with replacing everyone. Can you honestly say the same??

I have not made any statements here in support or against any political sides, although your preference is quite apparent due to your inability of seeing through your pom poms. If you actually knew anything about Hoboken's budget other than the misinformation that you get from your private cult, you would know that there is a lot more going on.

For one, it apparently costs about $93,000,000. to run this City if you take out all the one time expenditures, State fines, etc.. The City of Hoboken has never lowered the amount of Taxes collected since the 47% Tax increase, despite the fact that many of those expenses were part of a structural DEFICIT. Meaning that if these expenses were paid, which they were, they would not need to be placed in all of the following years budgets.

This also explains why all of the Mayoral candidates, Not just Dawn, were all making a promise of such a large tax cut. All that they were doing was just promising to collect the right amount of Taxes, and hoping the voting public was not sharp enough to understand what was really going on.

Ps. I give Mayor Zimmer credit for stepping up and trying to make cuts. I may not necessarily agree with the cuts she is attempting to make, but I respect the effort. And if she is adamant about these cuts, than she might not want all this money laying around, especially heading into binding arbitration with the Unions.
This coming from the guy who's initial post is riddled with assumptions that are not at all based in reality. Incorrect assumption #1, the surplus is $20mm. Incorrect assumption #2, that we don't whatever level of surplus we are holding to fund day to day operations or for emergencies. Incorrect assumption #3, city hall will spend any extra money wastefully even in the face of evidence that they are doing the opposite by cutting wasteful spending from the budget. Incorrect assumption #4, we have plenty of bonding power and could get credit quickly and cheaply if we needed it (are you kidding?). Incorrect assumption #5, that despite all the evidence that Bit Mazon continues to be a twit, she is somehow right and getting on the right track. Someone who's assumptions are so far off the mark shouldn't at all lecture anyone about making assumptions.

No, it is obvious you have an agenda here. You keep toeing the "paid for by Mason" line despite the fact that only does nobody agree with you, but there is ample evidence that Mason is just plain wrong.
Don't worry taxpayer. That '$20m' surplus is already spent to cover part of the $52m guaranteed taxpayer bond for when the Hoboken Hospital can't be sold.
I certainly hope that does not happen. If you think the layoffs were bad now that would be a real disaster.

Sent from my iPhone
Agreed. From your mouth to God's ear. I truly hope the hospital will be sold and no on loses their job. However, yesterday's Bergen Record (8/13) printed a story about Secaucus Meadowlands Hospital having trouble with the State regarding their sale to a private buyer and their plans for the hospital's future. Not going well over there and just don't want a repeat in Hoboken. The difference between Secaucus and Hoboken is that the Hoboken taxpayers are on the hook for $52m plus.
Hobokenswabee's avatar

Hobokenswabee · 764 weeks ago

You say much and hit a lot of good themes. And then you self-destruct. What kind of finance course or business have you run?

Did you attend the Bet Mazin School of Government on Hudson St? Good grief. Incompetence hurts and playing politics with phoney numbers is beyond incompentent. It's frankly disturbing and this woman has been a horror show for quite a while now.

Okay, please go back to the safety of that embryonic Masonic environment at Hoboken411. They'll be happy to receive you back in the censored fold.
There are no words to address the absolute insanity of the Bet Mazin press release. It is gutter politics, but why would I be surprised just how low she will stoop in her quest to be Queen of Hoboken. This is truly scary stuff.
Katie_Scarlett's avatar

Katie_Scarlett · 764 weeks ago

It would be easier to create a list of things Beth understands w/regard to city politics:
1. Running a losing campaign
2. Spending wayyyy too much money and losing
3. Being disingenuous
4. Being ignorant of most things pertaining to effectively running the city.

That about sums it up.
You forgot a few.
5. Lying through her teeth
6. Running a smear campaign that ends up blowing up in her face
7. Plastering cars w/ nasty fliers which ultimately end up littering our streets
8. sending out way too much junk mail
9. Outing posters on 411
10. Aligning herself w/ some of the nastiest and sleaziest people in town (a crime some so called reformers are guilty of as well)
Can't fix Hoboken in one year folks, so bend over or move your choice.
11 replies · active 763 weeks ago
Good point Boink! What's next Beth Mason and Perry Mason Klaussen start a recall Zimmer campaign alongside Omar Dwyer.

Sent from my iPhone
Kurt you need to Mod your headline since both the Hoboken Patch and the Hoboken Reporter are running
the same $20 million dollar surplus story, they all seem to think it is a big deal.

Question here, who runs their home or life without a stash of cash? We can't fix our little corner of the world with Emergency Appropriations and borrowing. A little saving goes a long way to fixing allot of things. I believe the cost of borrowing will go down becuase we have reserves, and the rainly day money will be spent on something, let's just hope it won't be spent on pork for cronies.
No they are not running the same "$20 million surplus story." They are running facts that conflict with Hoboken411 and the Lane "the liar" Bajardi's story.

No one is claiming there's a $20 million surplus except for Perry Klaussen, Lame Bajardi, and Bet Mazin.

And Kurt doesn't need you to tell him what to write.
I always like suggestions. I don't have to always follow through with them. It is interesting to see how blatant Beth Mason and Hoboken 411 are comingled in terms of talking points.

Sent from my iPhone
The headline in the Reporter is "Should Hoboken taxpayers get some of city's $20 million budget surplus back?" I would think even a blind squirrel could find that nut LAME-O

Do you need me to quote the "20 million" from the Patch Story too?
No, we can read for ourselves. We don't need a hoboken411 fanatic to tell us how to read.
Thanks but those lies along with that menace Mason are mnot required. Or wanted.
That article on 411 is written by someone who knows next to nothing about budgets. If 411 wanted to show that there were an unnecessarily large, he'd have posted a monthly cash flow statement and balance sheet that showed a very large surplus. I am guessing no such document exists b/c we alternatively build and dip into that surplus from month to month as we generate or spend cash.
Katie_Scarlett's avatar

Katie_Scarlett · 763 weeks ago

What do you expect when the main writer has no college education? In fact, rumor is, neither one of them have a college degree.
Lack of a college education is no excuse for being stupid. I know plenty of people with degrees that are complete morons. But I guess a few basic accounting classes would have helped. People that can't read or understand financial statements shouldn't be commenting on what an financial statement says.
Katie_Scarlett's avatar

Katie_Scarlett · 763 weeks ago

You're right. There are a lot of dumb college grads. But it is damn near impossible to understand municipal finance without some advanced degree. That's why it's important to have a good BA and someone on the council who understands finance. H411 should stfu.
I wouldn't mind him saying something intelligent once in a while. I get this feeling that hell will freeze first.
I don't know from finance, but I can't see how anyone is counting how much "extra money" is laying around if no attempt at fixing the soccer field has been line-itemed in. And that's just the first thing that comes to my mind.

But c'mon, what do you want in these cloying weekly press releases? I would say features like maybe recipes for dip and such or maybe a game of "Jumble" would be entertaining. Or maybe a children's fairy tale or some surrealistic art would be nice.
tax payer's avatar

tax payer · 764 weeks ago

With regards to the soccer field, I thought the City Council took a vote months ago to bond and repair it. Why are they not fixing it? Why is such a key asset sitting idle. The same goes for Pier C. What the heck is going on there? If the contractor does not want to finish it, than terminate his contract and find someone that will. Should I dare ask about 1600 Park..

If the City is shorthanded, than stop the nonsense with trying to make cuts, and hire what you need to get the job done. Believe me, I am not for waste, but I am also not for sitting idle and wasting time while watching things not get done. A City of this size should be running efficiently, but the quality of life should not suffer.

The concept is simple, collect the appropriate amount of taxes that the City needs to operate properly, not a dime more. If the City has a line item for reserves, than return whatever is left over. You don't need reserves and a surplus at the same time. Too much double talk going on here. We bond for things as a City, but also have the money on hand to pay for them.

Ps. It's not a good practice to keep a surplus laying around, when you have your hand out to the Federal Government for repair money for Pier C, your hand is out to the State for School Aid, and your hand is out to the County for road repair. Also, you are fighting with the Police and Fire Unions about jobs and back pay. Who came up with this strategy??????

This Mayor is better than this. Stop listening to whoever is advising you on this stuff, and go with your gut. All that I mentioned above is not making Hoboken better than when you took office. Now clean house, even if it means taking the heads off of a few that you believed in, otherwise over time they will blame you.
1 reply · active 763 weeks ago
"collect the appropriate amount of taxes that the City needs to operate properly, not a dime more. If the City has a line item for reserves, than return whatever is left over. You don't need reserves and a surplus at the same time."

Do you suggest we put aside money for retroactive pay? How about: Oops- I let people retire early w/out checking with the state(4m)? Oops! I sold the garage with no plan to place it elsewere?, Oops! i didnt require the developer to use apporopriate materials while building a pier (12m)?, Oops! sold off all assets to cover emergencies?, Oops! bought a hospital when I couldn't run my own finances and knew nothing about healthcare(52m)? Oops! I illegally underfunded the budget(10m)? Oops! the housing market crashed and taxpayers are asking for re-evals and refunds? As well as the many other issues that need to be attended to?

"We bond for things as a City, but also have the money on hand to pay for them."
???? If we had money on hand to pay for things why would we need to bond?

"It's not a good practice to keep a surplus laying around, "
This currently is too one-sided. I am humbly asking each and every council-person to send out a weekly press release about whatever enters your mind so everyone in town will hear your name repeated and know you can still fog a mirror. That way we will have much more balanced coverage since all media feel compelled to print everything released. No worries on content, the public will have no idea if said releases are self serving.
1 reply · active 763 weeks ago
On second thought, weekly press releases are excessive. See schedule below:
Not on council, running for council in next 3 months: twice a month
On council, running for re-election in next three months: once a month
On council, running for re-election eventually: once every six to nine months
Off council, or on council not running for re-election: oversee press releases of protege
Not on council, running for mayor eventually: once every three months
On council, running for mayor eventually: weekly

Note: at your discretion, substitute a 4 color glossy mass mailing for any of the above
THIS APPEARED ON MY DOOR THIS EVENING, ON A BIG GLOSSY CARD WITH BET'S PICTURE, PERSONALLY AUTOGRAPHED BY BET HERSELF!

Hi, I'm Bet Mazin adn I am an idiot.But I think that you are really even bigger idiots than I am. And RIcky agrees with me and so does my good web master and paid political scum bucket blogger, FIn Boy, even though he lives in Weehawken. Well, eough about me, Bet Mazin, and my minions for now. I really just wanted to share some good news with you. My good friend and fellow moron, Mikey Russo, told me that his Uncle Goerge told him that there is a pot of gold being hidden at City Hall by that evil Sorcoress posing as Mayor of Hoboken, Auroa Dawn. And that evil pretend she is the Queen of Reform is not willing to share it with anyone!
She is still selfish, selfish, selfish, just like how she stole the crown of reform royalty from me, Bet Mazin, and won't return it to me, Bet Mazin. And the rest of the Axis of Stoopid, including that financial genius Lame and the idiot that I pay in dog food to keep Hate411 alive swore that they are right, so it must be true. So, now, here is the deal. They told me that it is easily worth 20M, and its not all in quarters! All I need from you is your help to fight that evil Queen and install me on my throne at City Hall, the one with the pruple pillow, and I will promise to write you all really big checks, bigger than the ones that I write on election day! And this time, I will make sure that Mo and Inez are not too busy ruining the reputations of applicants for school superintendent to forget to reorder checks so that each of you will get your very own individual check! Personally autorgraphed by me, Bet Mazin, the Queen of Hoboken. Can I count on you to help me help you?
?
What percentage of your condo's annual budget does the $10-12m represent? You would think that Beth would alter (or tweak") her message to reflect reality and truth. Or maybe not...
1 reply · active 761 weeks ago
Redrider765's avatar

Redrider765 · 761 weeks ago

Rich doesn't equal smart or honest.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE-

Politician in City Hall Wants to Be Your Next Mayor.

A $2 million campaign and you don't get it yet?
Mattaccino's avatar

Mattaccino · 761 weeks ago

Kurt, can we please have a countdown clock for her remaining days in office? Mille grazie!
NotsoEasyE's avatar

NotsoEasyE · 761 weeks ago

As I understand it these staff increases totaled a whopping $26,000.

It certainly doesn't look good to do that when you're laying people off, but it's disingenuous to suggest that it makes any difference.
Lookforward's avatar

Lookforward · 761 weeks ago

Surprised that flyers were only distributed in 2nd Ward. The budget decisions impact on the entire city. All citizens should attend as many council meetings as they can or view them on cable or the internet so that they are aware of what's happening. At the council meetings, you can voice you opinion on the individual ward problems, but more importantly, on the BIG PICTURE.

Post a new comment

Comments by