Thursday, February 10, 2011

By the Numbers: Hoboken's Public School District Costs Per Pupil Are Down This Year

On the New Jersey State Education website, The cost per pupil for Hoboken's Puiblic School district is now listed for the years 2007-2008 to 2009-2010. By using the comparative cost per pupil total Hoboken is down 10.7% from the year prior and using total cost per pupil Hoboken is down 14% (see below for an explanation of the two measurements). That is a significant cost savings per pupil in one year.  From a fiscal standpoint, the district is heading in the right direction. At some point the Hoboken BOE board majority should get some credit for these reductions, all politics aside.


Source: http://education.state.nj.us/rc/rc10/index.html

On the bottom two lines of the of the chart there are two total cost figures.  One is Total Cost which is $18.7K per pupil and the other is Comparative Cost which is $21.8K per pupil in the Hoboken High School for 2010.

Here are the definitions of each of these two terms:

1) The first is Comparative Cost Per Pupil which represents comparisons with districts of similar budget type. The components that comprise the comparative cost per pupil are as follows: classroom instructional costs; support services (attendance and social work, health services, guidance office, child study team, library and other educational media); administrative costs (general administration, school administration, business administration, and improvement of instruction); operations/maintenance of plant; food services, and extracurricular costs. The total of these expenditures is divided by the average daily enrollment to calculate a total comparative cost per pupil.

(2) The second is the Total Cost Per Pupil which, in addition to all of the costs listed above for the comparative cost, includes costs for tuition expenditures and payments to preschool providers; transportation; other current expenses (lease purchase interest, residential costs, and judgments against schools); equipment; facilities/acquisition; and restricted expenses less nonpublic services and adult schools. The total of these expenditures is divided by the average daily enrollment, combined with all students sent out of the district as reported on the ASSA (annual state aid collection) to calculate a total cost per pupil.

Note: Hoboken BOE member Maureen Sullivan always prefers to use the higher costs to make Kid's First look bad. Again, using the comparative cost number Hoboken is down 10.7% from the year prior and using total cost Hoboken is down 14%. That is a significant cost savings per pupil in one year.  If Governor Christie chooses to cut state aid then of course taxes are at risk of going up but it won't be because costs per pupil are going up at least this year. They are trending down. ◦
Share/Bookmark

Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
HobokenReformer's avatar

HobokenReformer · 735 weeks ago

What is the denominator in all these ratios? Did the ratios decrease because there were more students or because actual dollars were saved.

Looking at the ratios alone is not the way to judge performance.
1 reply · active 735 weeks ago
costs are down
hullabaloo's avatar

hullabaloo · 735 weeks ago

A reduction of $3K per student is significant. Is there more work to be done? Yes, but the trend is the right direction and the hard work is being done. There are no quick fixes here. Kudos to the BOE and the leadership of the leadership of the majority.
hullabaloo's avatar

hullabaloo · 735 weeks ago

... oops that should read: Kudos to the BOE and the leadership of the majority.
delivered.vacant's avatar

delivered.vacant · 735 weeks ago

I wish it was that simple, but it’s not. Higher student enrollment is responsible for more than half of the decrease in average cost per student. 2008 saw a dip in the number of students attending public education to 1,873. In 2009 enrollment grew by 81 students, all in the lower grades, and nearly half of them went to Wallace.

If average cost per student was the only indicator, the BOE should set a course to increase enrollment quickly.
This budget seems to be obsessive because there are many casual things in this list that are required the most. It sure is good to make the tender for getting all the new things.

Post a new comment

Comments by