RAMOS PROPOSES MEASURE TO HELP CONSUMERS PAY MEDICAL BILLS WITHOUT TARNISHING CREDIT HISTORY
(TRENTON) – Assemblyman Ruben J. Ramos, Jr. is introducing legislation that would require health care providers to employ more practical measures when first attempting to collect payment for services, prior to reporting the outstanding debt to a private collection agency or a consumer reporting agency.
“Everyone has a responsibility to pay medical bills and debts and no one should escape or evade their responsibilities,” said Ramos (D-Hudson). “However, emergencies happen. Sometimes unexpected medical costs are too much to pay all at once and good faith efforts are made. When these efforts are made, debt collectors shouldn't be harassing people and threatening their credit history.”
This bill would require that a health care provider, including a facility or an individual, observe certain practices during the collection of an outstanding balance in a patient account not reimbursed by a third party payer.
Specifically, in the case of a patient to whom a health care provider submits a bill for an outstanding balance, the provider must:
(1) Provide prior written notification to the patient that the provider intends to refer the patient’s account to a private collection agency at least 30 days prior to making that referral; and
(2) Not communicate information about the outstanding balance in a patient’s account to a consumer reporting agency until at least 45 days have elapsed since the date that the provider referred the patient’s account to a private collection agency.
“This bill provides a lifeline for debtors to make their payments and not have it affect their credit. At the same time, it also employs a measure of fairness to protect the interests of medical providers and debt collectors by allowing them to still pursue collections,” added Ramos.
A health care provider that violates the provisions of the bill would be subject to penalties to be determined by the Commissioner of Health and Senior Services or the Director of the Division of Consumer Affairs pursuant to statute. The bill would take effect on the 90th day after enactment and apply to health care services provided on or after the effective date.
Ramos intends to introduce the legislation the next time the Assembly is in session.
My comment: Since I have recently had a major medical episode of my own I can relate to the notion that it can sometimes be hard to pay medical bills even when you have health insurance. For discussion: Is this proposal a good or even necessary idea to help protect consumers of health care or does it create an undue burden on health care providers? Share your thoughts below..... ◦

Katie_Scarlett · 761 weeks ago
ss1959 · 761 weeks ago
Redrider765 · 761 weeks ago
tess · 761 weeks ago
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 761 weeks ago
Katie_Scarlett · 761 weeks ago
Redrider765 · 761 weeks ago
stockntrade · 761 weeks ago
Katie_Scarlett · 761 weeks ago
stockntrade · 761 weeks ago
We be chillin in da 4th all day wit dis.
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 761 weeks ago
Katie_Scarlett · 761 weeks ago
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 761 weeks ago
I pay the bills too Katie with 10 years in Enterprise Resource Planning Project Management. I know we differ on issues but I don't mind paying taxes for worthwhile issues where the government can help people who need it.
Where I will always agree with you is if there is waste or promises made but can't be met then the appropriate cuts must be made. The issues in Hoboken are non partisan and lead to Intense Debate on this site at time. Letthe dialogue flourish.
On this bill I am Neutral since I don't know enough.
Sent from my iPhone
Katie_Scarlett · 761 weeks ago
As for this bill - any bill that has the premise of shifting personal burden to the public = a bill I'm not happy about. Again, if someone is destitute that is one thing - isn't that what medicaid is for, but if someone chooses to buy cigarettes, HDtvs etc, rather than paying their bills, sorry, I'm not subsidizing them. Hell, I didn't have cable for a long time b/c I couldn't afford it. I still don't have any premium cable channels and I have a job, I just can't justify the cost.
JustTheFacts · 761 weeks ago
tax payer · 761 weeks ago
Have you ever been billed for a procedure that did not take place, and than have to pay it so the incompetent Hospital staff does not ruin your credit. Than your left chasing your tail to get your money back. Ever been put on hold for 45 minutes after pushing #1for English, #3 for a certain Hospital, #2 for certain division, #5 for billing, etc... all to get your money back.
Ever have a family member have Cancer and watch the insurance companies play the "not covered" or "pre-existing condition" game.... and immediately sending them to the vulture collection agents while your loved one is fighting for their life!
Some people here have obviously lived privileged lives and have not had the unfortunate pleasure of falling between the cracks. Insurance Companies and Doctors are at War with each other, and the patient always ends up being sacrificed with inferior care, excessive billing, and lack of coverage. Do you think people want to get ill just to take advantage of their coverage or lack of coverage.
This is a great bill that will put a check valve on these medical providers. The same providers that squander money, especially when no one is looking. Just go and read the recent articles about the hundreds of millions of dollars that were blown at St Vincent's in NYC, and ended with the ultimate shut down. Than let me know how you feel about the "Poor Hospitals".
I support Legislation that protects people who are going through a rough time from being bullied by large Institutions. Your bills are your bills and need to be paid, you just may need a little more time, especially if they are due to an unforeseen illness. The same does not apply for an an additional "plasma TV" that you can not afford to pay for...
essayontime · 500 weeks ago