In this email Maureen focuses on the budget, the superintendent cap and junkets amongst other things besides her seething contempt of Kids First. I do believe Maureen is sincere when she says she will cut more than Kids First but the problem is she does not present substantial cuts to the voters (or at least me) and what the impact will be to the students (if any). It is the voters she will ultimately be accountable to this year and next when her three year term is up.
From Maureen Sullivan BOE Board Member:
January 11, 2011 - School Board meeting tonight
Happy New Year!
I wanted to take this opportunity to update you on some important matters that will come before the School Board on Tuesday. The introduction of the new school budget, the audit of last year's finances, the new superintendent's contract, the departure of interim superintendent Peter Carter, and another high-priced junket for board member Frances Rhodes-Kearns are some of the topics on the agenda.
The board has just gotten a look at the proposed 2011-12 budget as well as the audit of the books for 2009-10. Despite claims of a tax cut from Kids First, the schools portion of our tax rate actually increased from 1.176 per $100 assessed value in calendar year 2009 to 1.199 per $100 in calendar year 2010, according to our outside auditors. For a home assessed at $500,000, that's an increase of $115, when we were assured taxes were not going up.
As we move into budget season, it's clear that "creative accounting" is on the agenda once again. Last year, the board approved a budget of $57,882,147. This year, the administration has drawn up a budget of $57,966,973. That's up slightly, by $84,826. But the administration is presenting this as a cut of 4%. That's because it is comparing one year's total expenditures and revenues, which typically exceed our initial budgets by $2 million, with a proposed budget for the upcoming year. If we stick to apples to apples (comparing the proposed budget for this current year with the one beginning July 1), we've got a higher budget on tap for next year, not a lower one. You can see how misleading this is...this year they say they are cutting the budget 4% and last year Kids First said they cut the budget 7%. With this kind of accounting, there won't be a budget at all in a few years.
Last year, I led the charge against the board approval of a $3,000 junket to Chicago for board member Fran Rhodes-Kearns. I lost that vote, but later the county superintendent vetoed the trip. That didn't stop the board's finance committee from going ahead with approval for her to attend a two-day junket in Washington, D.C. next month to learn how to lobby members of Congress. If it's approved on Tuesday, it will cost taxpayers nearly $1,900, including $450 for a business class train trip on the Acela (specifically forbidden by state statute) and more than $540 in hotel charges.
Among the topics that she will be getting instruction on is learning how to lobby against members of Congress and the U.S. Dept of Education who "voice support for expanding charters... ." As a board, we certainly have never discussed the idea of one of our board members going to Washington to fight charter schools. I'm not sure if the many Hoboken taxpayers who have their children in charter schools want their tax money going to fight those schools.
And the state has finally approved a contract for new superintendent Mark Toback, one that meets the salary cap of $155,000. The board will vote on it at Tuesday's meeting. Despite overwhelming evidence that the state would not approve a superintendent contract over the new cap, and over my objections, the board pushed ahead with a contract that was nearly $20,000 over the state's mandate. And then the board voted 8-1 to sue the state. Would the state have approved a contract last year that met the cap? I think so.
Interim Supt. Peter Carter will depart the district on Jan. 31 and will be replaced by Asst. Supt. Walter Rusak until Dr. Toback gets released from his current contract and begins here.
I encourage you to attend the meeting, which starts at 7 p.m. in the board office at 1115 Clinton St. There is an opportunity at the beginning of the meeting to discuss agenda items and at the end of the meeting for items not on the agenda. Here is the link to the agenda:
http://hoboken.k12.nj.us/files/January%2011%202011%20BOE%20Stated%20Session%20Agenda.pdf
Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions.
Best regards,
Maureen Sullivan ◦

HobokenReformer · 745 weeks ago
You must really like the fact that (while city hall under Zimmer's great leadership is making serious progress in raining in the excessive spending) the BoE keeps spending freely, delivering yet another tax increase! These are just the numbers, and it isn't Maureen's fault that KF is unwilling to entertain any ideas that have to do with cutting anything. The KF BoE has been in the majority for long enough so that they cannot blame the tax levy on past BoEs anymore. So far, they have been a major disappointment to taxpayers.
Gardiner4Hoboken 90p · 745 weeks ago
As far as the junket that is worthy of discussion but so far that is all Maureen is offering in tax cuts. What will that save, one third of one cent? Surely she has mire to offer than that but all we hear is her saber rattling over some junket. Will not help tax situation one iota.
Sent from my iPhone
hullabaloo · 745 weeks ago
guest · 745 weeks ago
Sullivan has provided not one proposal to the public or otherwise, cut the budget.
guest · 744 weeks ago
Eliminated positions totaling more than $1 Million;
Uncovered the misappropriation of $1.6 Million; Recovered uncollected funds totaling $500,000;
Eliminated food deficit totaling over $300,000; Cut $68,000.00 from athletic supplies;
Reduction of two principal positions and one vice principal position.
DECREASED THE BUDGET: Budget FY 2010-11 is $57,882,147 vs. 2009-10 which is $62,013,193; a decrease of $4,131,046 or 7 per cent, while keeping the tax levy flat and not accepting the additional 4 per cent in municipal taxes allowed by law. Decreased per pupil costs by $4,417 over two years – an 18 per cent decrease! We championed the transition from the floundering IB program, which only graduated five IB diplomas in five years, to the more flexible and widely accepted AP program. Provided a savings of $250K re: non resident students, maintenance postions went from 60 full time to 38 full time, part time maintenance positions cut in half, the list goes on
Happy with 5% decrease but a 7% decrease shows excessive spending? Really?
deleted8670214 100p · 745 weeks ago
If she wants to critique KF and give us an honest assessment of their performance, how about she tell us what the budget would have been without any cuts by KF and with these raises built into the budget and then tell us how much more or less KF is vs. that benchmark. Until I see that baseline budget, her criticisms aren't worth commenting on b/c they are meaningless and probably just done out of spite.
Personally I don't think she will do this sort of analysis b/c it would probably show that KF did indeed cut the budget substantially.
Beth&RickyEvil · 744 weeks ago
Do your JOB!
ss1959 · 745 weeks ago
Hobbs · 745 weeks ago
Mrs. Sulivan took a lot of their money. ;)
hullabaloo · 745 weeks ago
Beth&RickyEvil · 744 weeks ago